Harmony Hollow Software

The Unethical SEO Myth


"The use of black hat SEO techniques are completely unethical." Really? I completely disagree.

Is it unethical because these techniques are attempts to give a webmaster an advantage over their competition? If this is the case, stop participating in SEO forums, stop using WordTracker, stop studying or engaging in SEO at all, because any of those things are ways to help get you a leg up on your competition. In fact, if it is your argument that this is unethical because it gives one person an advantage over another, stop building websites because there are plenty of businesses out there that don't have a website. You may be taking advantage of a medium some people don't have access to.

Is it unethical because it violates Google's Webmaster Guidelines (http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html)? If this is the case, again, abstain from any SEO whatsoever, because those guidelines state 'Another useful test is to ask, "Does this help my users? Would I do this if search engines didn't exist?"' If you are building sites for your users and disregarding search engines, things like "SEO", "keyword density", "SERPs", etc. hold no interest for you. By even considering what effect your actions have on your SERPs you are violating Google's guidelines.

Dictionary.com's primary definition for "unethical" is based on "approved standards". Who sets these standards? Google? Google is a company. Google's primary focus is on generating profits, as any company their size has to be. Do you have any doubt that they are willing to take advantage of nearly any legal opportunity to gain an advantage over Yahoo or any of their other competitors?

Why do people in this industry choose to set their "moral compasses" by a company's guidelines? Google sets these guidelines because it makes it easier for them to produce search results superior to their competitors'; they don't want to have to expend resources on excluding sites that game their algo. I like Google, they have a fantastic product and they are one of those companies that I find easy to admire, but I certainly don't believe they created those guidelines in an attempt to create this utopian internet where everything is "fair"; they didn't and never claimed to.

Most of the world's economies are based on capitalism and free trade. Google has a cash cow and her name is AdSense/AdWords. Webmasters compete against each other with their cold hard cash to see who can be #1. Is it unethical to squash your competition by outbidding them? Even if it was an unemployed guy with two ex-wives, three kids, a mortgage, $5 to his name, and a mammoth drug habit? Nearly everyone in this industry would say, "No it's business."

If you are an SEO professional and you are optimizing sites, is it unethical to use "black hat" techniques on clients' sites? I certainly don't think so, as long as you make very clear to the client what risks are involved beforehand. Now if you don't tell them they will get banned if caught; I would certainly call that unethical. Ammon Johns, known as Black_Knight at his site, the Cre8asite forums at www.cre8asiteforums.com who, in a post, said "To my philosophy, the SEO who refuses to properly inform their clients of all available techniques and the costs risks and benefits is not ethical. Whether that is failure to tell them of risks, or failure to tell them of strengths. It is the clients role to make the choice, and a truly ethical SEO will enable the client to make a fully informed choice, not just one that meets what the search engines say is okay for all."

So is cloaking, creating doorway pages, search engine spamming, or other similar "black hat" techniques illegal? I know of no law that forbids this stuff as long as you aren't violating someone's copyrights by duplicating their text, stealing their bandwidth, etc. I would be the first to label such techniques "unethical", frustrating, illegal, deplorable, name your word.

The remaining unanswered question is, "Who decides what is 'unethical', who sets 'the standard'?" You and I as internet professionals do. Some people choose to draw the "unethical" line just beyond what they do to improve their own SERPs; anything past that is "unethical". In relation to this subject, I draw this line pretty close to what the American government calls "illegal". I would call almost anything done with a primary intent to damage another website/company "unethical"; and most anything done under those circumstances is also illegal.

Having said all that, to my knowledge, I'm not doing anything on any of my (or my clients') sites that any major SE would consider banning me for; I'm certainly aggressive with the "white hat" stuff. I have dabbled with some of the more risky techniques in the past, but I have put way too much work into my sites (the ones that are worth trying to achieve high rankings for, anyway) that I'm just not willing to risk getting them banned; the risk isn't worth it to me. So while I don't participate in any "black hat" (or what I prefer to call "risky") activities, I just don't like the idea of those who do being labeled "unethical".

This is certainly an issue where people who have an opinion are passionate about it, but I invite you to examine your own motives for calling aggressive search engine optimization techniques "unethical".

About The Author

Damian owns a small website development business dedicated to providing affordable websites to small businesses. You can visit his website at www.divergentlines.com or contact him at dsmith@divergentlines.com

Add to these social bookmarking sites:

Add to: Mr. Wong Add to: Webnews Add to: Icio Add to: Oneview Add to: Folkd Add to: Yigg Add to: Linkarena Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icio.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Simpy Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Netscape Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Technorati Add to: Newsvine Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Information

MORE RESOURCES:

Homepage Sliders: Bad For SEO, Bad For Usability
Search Engine Land
One of the most prevalent design flaws in B2B websites is the use of carousels (or sliders) on the homepage. Carousels are an ineffective way to target user personas, which ends up hurting the site's SEO and usability. In fact, at the recent Conversion ...



Search Engine Roundtable

SEO Consultant's Parents Senselessly Murdered
Search Engine Roundtable
Renae and Lola Cottam One thing about the SEO industry is that for the most part, we are a tight community and we do care about each other. When I hear sad news about a fellow SEO, I feel it in the pit of my stomach. So sharing this type news is ...



Google Makes Non-Desktop SEO an Absolute Necessity
Search Engine Watch
I have seen many agencies espousing the benefits of having a mobile SEO strategy based on creating differentiated, purely mobile experiences but it would appear to me that as device fragmentation continues, it would be better to help a brand achieve ...
Four mobile SEO mistakes you shouldn't be makingEconsultancy (blog)
Google aims to make mobile SEO mandatoryMobile Commerce Press
Google to Target Bad Mobile SEOSearch Engine Marketing (blog)

all 7 news articles »


Work Smartly by Using SEO Diversity & EMD Recovery Tips
Search Engine Journal
Using Synonyms: Before LSI, using synonyms is one of the key tactics of SEO but now Google is considering the synonyms as the same words and playing with synonyms to diversify the keywords will not going to be easy. However, it definitely helps you if ...



From Microdata & Schema To Rich Snippets: Markup For The Advanced SEO
Search Engine Land
Last week, I attended the SMX Advanced session, “From Microdata & Schema To Rich Snippets: Markup For The Advanced SEO,” moderated by Elisabeth Osmeloski with speakers Marcus Tober, founder of Searchmetrics Inc., Julia Gause, Director of SEM for ...



Data Analysis for SEO: Industry KPIs For A Mature Industry
Search Engine Land
It was in the 1990s that Archie — generally considered to be the first Internet search engine — was written. But it wasn't until WebCrawler and Lycos in 1994 that publicly accessible full-text search became generally available and spawned the demand ...



PPC and SEO: Higher Conversion Rates Fuel the Need for Better Integration
Search Engine Watch
PPC and SEO: Higher Conversion Rates Fuel the Need for Better Integration. by Jason Tabeling, June 18, 2013 Comments. Many paid search marketers often go about their business of optimizing their accounts without really caring about what else might be ...



Startups: Forget SEO, Play Lois Lane
ClickZ
Having been a part of three startup organizations myself, I can say with confidence that startups shouldn't spend a large portion of the marketing budget on SEO. Instead, a better strategy for enhancing your company's presence would be to maintain a ...



Search Engine Journal

Why Pay For Performance SEO Is Really Too Good To Be True (Provided You're ...
Search Engine Journal
SEO has a bad, bad name around the world and is, for many, a snake oil term – that's one of the reasons why some of us are gradually shifting to inbound marketing, which encompasses SEO and other free traffic-driving factors such as content and social ...

and more »


LOCUS-T Brings Improved Local SEO Services to Malaysia Businesses
eReleases (press release)
PETALING JAYA, Malaysia, July 19, 2013 /PRNewswire/ — SEO is important to any kind of online business sites and therefore LOCUS-T has come up with better local SEO services that can offer better options to local Malaysia businesses. LOCUS-T believes ...

and more »


Notice: Undefined index: TITLE in /var/www/vhosts/harmonyhollow.net/httpdocs/webmaster-resources/seo/inc/rss.inc on line 103
Google News

Home | Site Map
© 2008