Harmony Hollow Software

The Problem with Automated Accessibility Testing Tools


An automated accessibility tool is a piece of software which can test a web page, or even an entire website, for accessibility. Automated accessibility tools are useful because they can save you a huge amount of time. Don't want to check images for alt text on each and every page on your website? Run the site through an automated tester and it'll do it all for you!

Automated accessibility testing tools have been around for a long time and have historically been a useful way of checking websites for accessibility. Bobby, one of the first and most well-known automated accessibility testing tools, is now almost 10 years, and although is no longer freely available, plenty of other free tools such as WebXact (http://webxact.watchfire.com/) and Wave (http://wave.webaim.org/index.jsp)do exist.

But are these tools a little too good to be true? Can you test a website for accessibility so easily? Unfortunately the answer is a resounding no. There are a number of underlying problems associated with using just automated tools to test for accessibility:

Literal interpretation of guidelines

Any automated accessibility testing tool, being a piece of software, doesn't have very much in the way of common sense. It will interpret each and every accessibility guideline literally, without bearing any other thought to what else is on the page.

The definition of the word guideline, according to Dictionary.com, is "a rule or principle that provides guidance to appropriate behaviour". A guideline simply offers guidance to what the best practice is - it shouldn't just be applied without regard to other factors.

For example, one of the W3C accessibility guidelines states that a table summary should be provided for all tables. (This summary doesn't appear on the screen, but it's read aloud to screen reader users before reading through the table content.) Table summaries are useful as they tell screen reader users what to expect in the table. However, there may be a heading directly before the table and it describes what the table is about. In this instance, this summary is essentially useless as it will just repeat what the previous heading said.

Can't check any content issues

The way that content is structured both on the page and across the website is a massive part of accessibility. A website may be perfectly coded and conform to the highest coding standards. If its content is poorly structured though, the site will prove difficult to impossible for some special needs web users.

There are a number of important accessible content considerations, none of which automated accessibility testing tools can check for. Some of these important considerations include:

- Front-loading content so that each paragraph begins with the conclusion

- Ensuring content has been broken down into manageable chunks with descriptive sub-headings

- Using lists wherever appropriate

- Ensuring that plain and simple language is used

Can't check many coding issues

The vast number of accessibility guidelines tend to be related to how the site is coded. Automated accessibility testing tools are unfortunately unable to test for many of these too. Examples of HTML-related accessibility considerations which these tools can't check for include:

- Ensuring that text is real text and isn't embedded within images

- Making sure that the site functions without the use of JavaScript or Flash

- Providing equivalent text links if using server-side image maps

- Ensuring that the structure within the HTML reflects the visual appearance (e.g. headings are labelled as headings within the HTML code)

Outdated guidelines are used

Automated accessibility testing tools generally use the W3C accessibility guidelines, which by now are over five years old. As such, a number of these guidelines are outdated and don't apply anymore. In fact, some of them are now thought to hinder accessibility rather than help, so it's best to totally ignore these guidelines.

For example, an automated accessibility testing tool will probably insist that form items contain default place holding text. It may also insist that links need to be separated by non-link text. Neither of these guidelines are relevant anymore and their implementation could make accessibility worse rather than better.

Most guidelines aren't properly checked

Automated accessibility tools can check for a number of guidelines, and can tell you when a guideline isn't being adhered to. However, when the tool claims that a guideline is being fulfilled this may in fact be a false truth.

For example, if all images contain alt text then the software will report a pass for this guideline. But what if the alt text isn't descriptive of its image? What if alt text is crammed full of nonsensical keywords for search engines? How can an automated accessibility tool possibly know this?

Warnings may be misinterpreted

The reports generated by automated accessibility tools provide warnings, as well as errors. These warnings are basically guidelines that the automated tool can't check for, but which may be errors. Often they're not, and in fact they're often not even relevant. However, some people reading a report may try to get rid of these warning messages by making the appropriate changes to their site. By doing so, they may be implementing guidelines that needn't be implemented and inadvertently lowering the website's accessibility.

Conclusion

Automated accessibility testing tools can be useful as they can save a large amount of time in performing some very basic checks for accessibility. However, they must be used with caution and they cannot be used as a stand-alone guide for accessibility checking. Indeed, some expert accessibility knowledge should always be applied in evaluating a site accessibility, perhaps in conjunction with the fantastic web accessibility toolbar (http://www.nils.org.au/ais/web/resources/toolbar/) to help dramatically speed up manual checks.

This article was written by Trenton Moss. He's crazy about web usability and accessibility - so crazy that he went and started his own web usability and accessibility consultancy (Webcredible - http://www.webcredible.co.uk)

Add to these social bookmarking sites:

Add to: Mr. Wong Add to: Webnews Add to: Icio Add to: Oneview Add to: Folkd Add to: Yigg Add to: Linkarena Add to: Digg Add to: Del.icio.us Add to: Reddit Add to: Simpy Add to: StumbleUpon Add to: Slashdot Add to: Netscape Add to: Furl Add to: Yahoo Add to: Spurl Add to: Google Add to: Blinklist Add to: Blogmarks Add to: Diigo Add to: Technorati Add to: Newsvine Add to: Blinkbits Add to: Ma.Gnolia Add to: Smarking Add to: Netvouz Information

MORE RESOURCES:

San Francisco Chronicle

352 Media Group Named Fourth Best Web Development Company by ...
San Francisco Chronicle
The independent authority on web design and development, bestwebdesignagencies.com, has released their list of the thirty web development companies citing 352 Media Group as the fourth best web development company for May 2013. Each month the ...
Adlava Named Fifth Best Web Design Company by bestwebdesignagencies ...PR Web (press release)

all 2 news articles »


Long Awaited Web Development Toolkit Demo Released By ARME Realty.com
PR Web (press release)
Brokers all over the country have been salivating over the release of a demonstration of the ARME Realty.com real estate SEO web development toolkit, states ARME Realty.com. This demonstration finally provides a hands on of their high powered web ...
Real Estate SEO Web Development Toolkit Shows Promise For Future of Web ...Virtual-Strategy Magazine (press release)
HUD Homes for Sale in Wimauma FL via New ARME Realty.com Buyer Broker ...DigitalJournal.com (press release)

all 8 news articles »


Google preps Dart 1.0 to challenge JavaScript
InfoWorld
For the latest business technology news, follow InfoWorld.com on Twitter. Tags: Web Development, Java Programming, JavaScript, Web Browsers, Google, Google Dart · Print|. Google I/O 2013's Coolest Products and Services · 10 Star Trek Technologies That ...



Web development company
SpeakingTree (blog)
There are so many top web development companies in India. It is difficult to choose the top web design companies in India as well. Are you in search for best web designing companies in Bangalore? You have landed on the right place. At the end of the ...



Net@Work Named Third Best Web Development Company by ...
PR Web (press release)
The independent authority on web design and development, bestwebdesignagencies.com, has named Net@Work the third best web development company for May 2013. Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on Google+ Share on LinkedIn Email a ...



Joomla Application Development and Its Significance in Web Development
GroundReport
Most members from web development world would easily agree to this point. In such a scenario choosing an appropriate, user friendly, feature rich development platform become more than a necessity. Most of the business websites feature a number of ...



Kentico CMS Names Web Development Company, Bayshore Solutions, a Gold ...
PR.com (press release)
Tampa, FL, May 19, 2013 --(PR.com)-- Website development company, Bayshore Solutions, has recently reached Certified Partner Level with Kentico CMS (Content Management System). Development team members recently passed the Kentico Developer ...

and more »


Microsoft WebMatrix 3 Web Development Tool Comes With Deeper Windows ...
TechCrunch
Microsoft has released WebMatrix 3, the latest version of its free web development tool. The new version now comes with deeper Windows Azure integration and support for GitHub. WebMatrix users can now sign in through Windows Azure and create up to 10 ...

and more »


Victoria, British Columbia, Web Development and Internet Marketing College ...
PR Web (press release)
Three non-profit organizations are getting a free boost in their web presence thanks to Instructor Denis Eve and the new Practical Skills Web Development program at Q College. "We chose the non-profit sector because budgets are slim, online exposure is ...



Head of Web Development & Technology
ashdowngroup.com
Head of Web Development & Technology. Tweet. Salary: £100,000; Location: Central London, London; Job Type: Permanent; Sector: IT; Reference: ASH10897AC; Consultant Name: Annette Cridland; Telephone: 08456 434 456; Email: Send email; This is a ...



Notice: Undefined index: TITLE in /var/www/vhosts/harmonyhollow.net/httpdocs/webmaster-resources/web-development/inc/rss.inc on line 103
Google News

Home | Site Map
© 2006